Earn money
Ever considered the impact of “codebases” on human society or better still, how they are going to change it?
Why aren" there more CodeBases? The same question is asked by many organisations that are trying to understand how to use CodeBases effectively to generate revenue for their business.
This answer is clear when you ask:
How can we make your CodeBases productive, meaningful, and transformational?
Without getting any kind of response, you can still be good at your job, but you’re failing to bring real change to an organisation.
You are looking at new ways of doing things.
More than that, if you have an employee who thinks it is wasting their time, or an organisation that talks about “Code Bases” to their employees (the act of applying CodeBases) when they say “yes”, they are already successful.
If they don’t hear a response that says “Yes”, they might think “We aren’t able to do it”.
Coding teams that also spend much time coding are showing greater interest in using codebases, than organizations that spend less time coding.
All of these are driving towards a single goal — software is where the customers are.
It's clear how that involves CodeBases.
When people think about the future (and the potential of their jobs), they generally don’t think of coding. What they think about is the quality of their software and what it can do, rather than how to implement it effectively.
In our experience it’s by the time a company invests a lot of time, effort, and money into their technical products (a.k.a. CodeBases), that they are coming up with strong, user-friendly solutions.
Another way of thinking about the software industry is as an ecosystem of end markets — Software engineering teams build software that then gets delivered to customers who include software testers, software admins, testers, development teams, business people, integrators, and more.
This ecosystem is very self-evident as companies such as Apple and Microsoft, building their own hardware, create software that works well with their hardware. These company in turn go on to sell their software, as opposed to their hardware.
We’ve seen how different the software industry is from a physical consumer product industry.
You need to be smart in your data collection: the more data you collect, the smarter your products will become.
You need to be smart with how you share this information: some of us may have seen cases of companies just monetizing their own software, with little to no benefit to anyone.
But again — this is just the case in the software industry, for the same reasons that we don’t see people profiting from their computers, unless their products are something useful or innovative.
Data collection is easy if it comes from highly-paid, highly-trained data scientists.
If you’re not paying much for technical people with a PhD in Computer Science — or a broad perspective that can relate their experiences to many other industries — you have another approach.
You have your “software development team” that includes self-drive software engineers, developers, testers, IT teams, CI teams, QA teams, all of the different parts of the engineering cycle.
When you say “yes” to a technology team, you’re sending them on a value add tour of the business using their “software”.
If you think of yourself as a Software Development Company, why aren’t you a “Code Bases” Company? You are passing away!
That means your company is not in the software industry, is not moving towards making an impact, and is not “looking for solutions”, which are the business goals that everyone is aiming for.
There are companies like Amazon, Snapchat, Twitter, and numerous others that are providing what the “Software Development Company” like to do.
The question is: why aren’t your company doing the same?
Explain to anyone that you know how deeply companies that are making an impact, are invested in “Code Bases”.
0 Comments